Lysol Disinfecting Wipes

Redesigning the main image for a wipes multipack.

I led the image strategy for a 320-count multipack and ran the Amazon A/B test.

Explore the case
My role
Content strategy and experiment lead
Context
Lysol four-pack on Amazon
Timeline
· Amazon A/B test
Methods
Competitor review
Creative briefing
Amazon A/B testing

01 / Design problem

The pack count and scent labels lacked prominence.

The original main image made it hard to tell how many wipes came in the pack or which scents it included. Competitor review informed the hypothesis that a clearer count, benefit line and scent labels could help shoppers understand the offer and improve conversion.

Comparison image · B

Comparison image · B
Smaller quantity emphasis and a different benefit strip.

Revised image · A

Revised image · A
A prominent 320 count, simplified benefit language and scent grouping.

02 / Design decisions

The redesign prioritized count, benefits and scents.

I set these priorities in the brief. The designer produced the artwork and refined the pack arrangement and labels, with delivery coordinated by the project manager.

01 / Quantity

Lead with the pack count

Prominent 320 wipe count and 4-pack label.

Make the total wipe count the first thing a shopper sees.

02 / Purpose

Simplify the benefit line

Cleans, disinfects, freshens benefit strip.

The benefit strip gives shoppers a quick read on what the product does.

03 / Scents

Distinguish the scent variants

Lemon, Crisp Linen and Mango scent bands.

Short names and separate color bands distinguish the scents.

03 / A/B experiment

An A/B test compared both images on one listing.

I ran the test in Amazon Manage Your Experiments from July 8–14, 2026. The test tracked conversion for both the revised image (A) and the comparison image (B).

04 / Results

The revised image showed higher conversion.

Amazon reported a 99% probability that Version A performed better on this listing.

Conversion in the reported experiment≈15.7% relative lift
Revised A
0.671%
Comparison B
0.58%
Bars share a zero baseline. The displayed rates differ by about 0.091 percentage points.

Amazon’s most-likely projection was $1.46M in annual incremental sales for the tested listing, assuming the effect persisted.

See reported sample sizes
Reported sample sizes
Revised AComparison B
1,252,5881,253,461

05 / Takeaways

The conversion result applies to the full redesign.

The count, benefit line, scent labels and layout changed together. A follow-up test could isolate the larger count and measure its contribution to conversion. The team produced ten final image variants.

Back to Reckitt projectsNext caseNeuriva Ultra

Original project artifact